Transitive Regret
نویسندگان
چکیده
Often, preferences are driven by comparisons with choices not made. Preferences of a decision-maker over a set of options may arise from regret, i.e., from comparisons with alternatives forgone by the decision maker. This is natural when the decision maker has to choose between two options with random outcomes. Once the uncertainty is resolved he will know what outcome he received, but also what outcome he could have received had he chosen the alternative option. This ex ante comparison may cause him regret if his actual outcome is worse than the alternative. We ask whether regret-driven behavior is consistent with non-expected utility theories of choice. We show that the answer is no — such behavior is inconsistent with the assumption that preferences are transitive. If choices are made so as to minimize ex ante regret then preferences must be intransitive. —————————— Anderson School of Management, UCLA Department of Economics, Boston College
منابع مشابه
Transitive regret over statistically independent lotteries
Preferences may arise from regret, i.e., from comparisons with alternatives forgone by the decision maker. We show that when the choice set consists of pairwise statistically independent lotteries, transitive regret-based behavior is consistent with betweenness preferences and with a family of preferences that is characterized by a consistency property. Examples of consistent preferences includ...
متن کاملPreliminary draft Transitive Regret
Preferences of a decision-maker over a set of options may arise from regret, i.e., from comparisons with alternatives forgone by the decision maker. This is natural when the decision maker has to choose between two options with random outcomes. Once the uncertainty is resolved he will know what outcome he received, but also what outcome he could have received had he chosen the alternative optio...
متن کاملThe transitive core: inference of welfare from nontransitive preference relations
This paper studies welfare criteria under an environment in which a decision maker is endowed with a nontransitive preference relation. In such an environment, the classical utilitarian welfare criterion may not identify the welfare order, and the problem of maximizing the decision maker’s welfare becomes ambiguous. In order to find a criterion that applies to nontransitive preference relations...
متن کاملAn experimental investigation of violations of transitivity in choice under uncertainty
Several models of decision-making imply systematic violations of transitivity of preference. Our experiments explored whether people show patterns of intransitivity predicted by regret theory and majority rule. To distinguish “true” violations from those produced by “error,” a model was fit in which each choice can have a different error rate and each person can have a different pattern of true...
متن کاملTesting the Predictions of Decision Theories in a Natural Experiment When Half a Million Is at Stake
In the television show Affari Tuoi an individual faces a sequence of binary choices between a risky lottery with equiprobable prizes of up to half a million euros and a monetary amount for certain. The decisions of 114 show participants are used to test the predictions of ten decision theories: risk neutrality, expected utility theory, fanning-out hypothesis (weighted utility theory, transitive...
متن کامل